CHAPTER 6 Taking All Kinds of Samples 85
know what students think about a new policy on campus, they can just ask who-
ever is in their classes, as those students are a convenient sample of the student
population.
The problem is that the answer they get may be very biased. Most of the students
in their classes may come from the sciences, and those studying art or literature
may feel very differently about the same policy. Although our convenience
sample would be a valid sample of the background population of students, it would
be such a biased sample that the results would probably be rejected by the rest of
the faculty — especially those from the art and literature departments!
Given that the results from convenience samples are usually biased, you may
think that convenience sampling is not a good strategy. In actuality, convenience
sampling comes in handy if you have a relatively low-stakes research question.
Customer satisfaction surveys are usually done with convenience samples, such as
those placing an order on a restaurant’s app. It is simple to program such a survey
into an app, and if the food quality is terrific and the service terrible, it will be
immediately evident even from a small convenience sample of app users complet-
ing the survey.
While low-stakes situations are fine for convenience sampling, high-stakes
situations — like studying whether a new drug is safe and/or effective — require
study designs and sampling approaches completely focused on minimizing bias.
As with SRS, convenience sampling is prone to omitting important subgroups
from the sample. Minimizing bias through sampling and other strategies is cov-
ered in detail in Chapter 5, which examines clinical research and describes how
researchers must present a well-defined protocol that includes selection criteria,
a sampling plan, and an analytic plan that undergoes regulatory approval prior to
the commencement of research activities. Other strategies for minimizing bias are
presented in Chapters 7 and 20, which cover study designs and causal inference.
Sampling in multiple stages
When conducting large, epidemiologic surveillance studies, it is necessary to do
an especially good job of sampling, because governments use results from these
studies on which to base public policy. As an example, because being obese puts
community members at risk for serious health conditions, government public
health agencies have a vested interest in making accurate estimates of the rates of
obesity in their communities.
For this reason, to strive to obtain a representative sample, researchers designing
large epidemiologic surveillance studies use multi-stage sampling. Multi-stage
sampling is a general term for using multiple sampling approaches at different